Towards the end, the book starts to get sort of rushed and is not as exciting. In my opinion.Achievements: Iconic Classic | Major Motion Picture | Recommended by: The New York Times, The Chicago Tribune, Philadelphia Daily News, New York Herald, ALA Best Book for Young Adults | Winner of the Massachusetts Children’s Book Award But suffice it to say, The Outsiders is still pretty damn queer. Of course, this opens up entire graduate theses’ worth of questions over the supremacy of post-publication canon as dictated by the author versus the value of transformative work/fanfic/slashfic etc etc etc. But you could also choose to value your own interpretation over Hinton’s intent, and thus preserve the text’s value to you. So if your connection to The Outsiders is dependent on how it defined gayness, whether or not Hinton intended as much, then this might be a disappointing development. But like it or not, that’s her (financial and artistic) prerogative, and all you can do is ignore it. Maybe you don’t appreciate the fact that J.K. It’s like they say: never tweet your heroes.īut that’s the risk you take being part of a fandom. On the other hand, asking authors to clarify subtext, or to imagine for the reader what goes on outside of or beyond the text, is extremely risky fan behavior, because it can easily lead to a kind of chain reaction of disappointment and cognitive dissonance that tarnishes an otherwise treasured connection with a work of art. And while it’s unfortunate how this has played out, I can understand Hinton’s reaction to what she considers a radical interpretation of her signature work. Which is somewhat believable, assuming Hinton doesn’t spend her time being exposed to Tumblr or other places where you might find aggregated lists of YA books with queer themes. While claiming multiple times that she intended no gay subtext when she wrote the book at age nineteen, she manages to take a swipe at enthusiasts, and just generally act as though she’s been taken extremely off-guard by the entire topic, stating,“I never set out to make anyone feel safe.”
THE OUTSIDERS SE HINTON SERIES
Hinton says no, in what becomes an especially uncomfortable series of Twitter interactions. Was this a gay relationship that couldn’t be explicitly rendered as such back when the book was first published in 1967? The characters Dallas and Johnny Cade… are street toughs, and Dallas, the coolest, baddest-ass greaser of them all, is especially protective of Johnny, who comes from a home filled with abuse, alcoholism, and neglect. Hinton talking about her seminal work, The Outsiders. Which is why it was inevitable that we would see the following interaction take No. Whereas in the pre-microblogging days of furiously typed LiveJournals and other platforms about which you’re a little embarrassed for pouring your soul into (guilty), you were forced to share cultural and artistic interpretation among like-minded fans, you can now send your theories right to the source. Now that authors are on Twitter, we have entered into an unprecedented age of fan theory.
![the outsiders se hinton the outsiders se hinton](https://kbimages1-a.akamaihd.net/a23052f6-9868-4cd1-ac34-f2254fa91d75/1200/1200/False/the-outsiders-1.jpg)
![the outsiders se hinton the outsiders se hinton](https://images.gr-assets.com/hostedimages/1472341518ra/20182573.gif)
Hinton hasn’t the faintest idea where you got all these gay interpretations of The Outsiders Orders placed after December 16 will not ship until the new year. Hinton hasn’t the faintest idea where you got all these gay interpretations of The Outsiders » MobyLives